Research & Thoughts

The Future of Proprietary Trading

Installment I: Capco Regulatory Reform Series

Recent attempts at financial reform, such as the Dodd-Frank Act, restrict proprietary trading for speculative purposes, but not for other purposes such as market making and hedging. This delineation raises immediate questions regarding the reach and enforcement of reform provisions. Also to be determined is the effect proprietary trading limits will have on trade flow.

The lines are already blurred between proprietary trading and trading done on behalf of customers. For example, today a customer may want to sell a block of securities and an investment firm may or may not choose to position some of that block to make additional money. That decision impacts whether the transaction is considered proprietary trading.

Financial reform aims to keep firms from taking a position in something unless they have an offsetting trade, which will be difficult to police. Questions still to be resolved through regulatory rulemaking include how severely and along what dimensions trading will be restricted. Will the restrictions apply only to specified volumes or certain types of products? Will they be based on the intent of the transaction? Or, will the restrictions be applied across the board?

Comments

Comments are moderated and will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Leave a Comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
1 + 2 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
previous article
Rate this Article
Your rating: None Average: 2.8 (4 votes)
next article