Research & Thoughts

Controlling Volume and Flow

Installment II: Capco Regulatory Reform Series: Controlling Volume and Flow

The flash crash of U.S. stock markets on May 6, 2010, intensified the regulatory reform focus on controlling trading volume and flow. On that day, a slight downward slide became a plunging spiral as algorithmic and high-frequency trading routines took over and started working across different exchanges.

Trading is now so heavily automated that market-shaking events can happen in milliseconds. Regulators have already moved to introduce controls to handle “fat-finger” erroneous trades and anomalous algorithmic behavior. They are certain to try and manage trading speed, identify clear mistakes, and throttle back volume to prevent disruptive events in the future.

The question is how they should and will go about it. One approach, instituting circuit breaker triggers, was tested during the May incident. Circuit breakers were, in fact, in place that day, and they did slow the downward movement of the market. But in the end, they were only marginally effective given the conditions of the market and the trading volumes involved.

Comments

Comments are moderated and will be posted if they are on-topic and not abusive. For more information, please see our Comments FAQ.

Leave a Comment

  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <h1> <h2> <h3> <h4> <div>
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.

More information about formatting options

CAPTCHA
This question is for testing whether you are a human visitor and to prevent automated spam submissions.
6 + 9 =
Solve this simple math problem and enter the result. E.g. for 1+3, enter 4.
previous article
Rate this Article
Your rating: None Average: 1.7 (3 votes)
next article